| 8/11/2009 10:00:00 PM | Email this article Print this article |
|
Buzz Café owner Laura Maychruk (standing) told people gathered Monday night that this event was not as well planned or thought out as it should have been. FRANK PINC/Staff Photographer |
 |
 |
| Dennis Murphy, who learned of the protest through an e-mail group, replied to all with artwork late Monday night. |
| With gay community abuzz, event canceled Buzz Café kills book discussion amid protest
By MARTY STEMPNIAK Staff Reporter
A book discussion in Oak Park was canceled Monday after the village's gay community took offense at the subject matter - that there's a cure for gayness.
The Buzz Café, 905 S. Lombard, was scheduled to host Cornelius Williams, a former Oak Parker whose self-published book, Transition: From Homosexual to Preacher, talks about how he changed from gay to straight through God. In promotional material for the book, Williams refers to homosexuality and lesbianism as "spiritual and social vices."
Local gays and lesbians learned about Williams being on the Buzz schedule from an Illinois gay advocacy group invited to the event. As word spread about the book's premise, the protest began, initially questioning Buzz's judgment in giving the author a forum and then calling for cancellation.
"There's nothing Christ-like about reparative therapy," said Jim Kelly, 62, an Oak Parker who is gay and who sent one of the first e-mails questioning the event. "Christ's position was that all people were created in God's image. These folks need to demonize somebody, because without a devil, they're out of work."
Oak Parkers who have fought for gay rights expressed concern that the topic was about a battle considered won. In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association took homosexuality off its list of mental disorders. This summer, the American Psychological Association published a report concluding that "reparative therapy" by religious or other means can cause a person who is gay "emotional and spiritual distress."
Laura Maychruk, owner of the Buzz Café, decided Monday afternoon to cancel Williams' appearance but continue with a discussion about reparative therapy. She said she resisted canceling until people started claiming that the Buzz shared the author's views.
"I was really kind of surprised to get that reaction," said Maychruk, a veteran host of heated community forums, from politics to circumcision. Seeing when a topic crosses a line is tough, according to Maychruk. "I wish I could say there's a line, but I think life is mostly gray, and there is no real black and white for me."
Matt Johnston, the Buzz's scheduling manager, set up Williams' appearance about two weeks ago. Johnston, 29, himself a gay man, saw the discussion as a chance to debunk someone's opinion and educate people in Oak Park that such ideas exist. He also invited Allied for Equality, an Illinois gay advocacy group. Johnston wanted to hold the event, as a matter of free speech, up until people started defaming the café.
"If this exists, we need to get it out on the table and we need to bring people that know what they're talking about to confront it," Johnston said.
Dennis Murphy, 67, an Oak Park resident and owner of Poor Phil's, heard about the book discussion through a local political party's e-mail group. Murphy says he's not familiar with the specifics of Williams' stance but said he's disappointed that the man wasn't given a chance to speak.
"No matter how distasteful, he still has the legitimate right to express his view," Murphy said. "And I didn't like this mob mentality, ganging up on Laura and preventing something from happening, simply because they disagreed with what the talk would be about. I just found it very un-American."
Wiliams, 32, who now lives on Chicago's West Side, said in a phone interview that he approached the Buzz because he stops there frequently. He was "devastated" that the event was canceled and says he has reached out to local franchises of national coffeehouse chains.
Though his book says he's a preacher, Williams' Holy Remnant International Ministries, for which he's listed as president and CEO, was dissolved in November, according to the Illinois Secretary of State's Web site. Williams says there's no dissolution, but that he was late in filing an annual report. He points to his own experience in disputing the American Psychological Association's report. "I don't buy the facts. What I agree with and relate to is the scripture," Williams said.
People at the café Monday said reparative therapy isn't worth discussing. They suggested topics where the public could help effect change: civil unions and the military's don't-ask-don't-tell policy. "Issues where information is useful," said Ann Armstrong, 67, a straight Oak Parker who has fought for gay rights. "It's a fool's errand to think reparative treatment is anything but hypocrisy or snake oil."
With no Oak Park village board meeting this Monday, trustee Ray Johnson, who is gay, was at the Buzz. "I did not want the Buzz Café to give a forum to this gentleman who is espousing bigotry and hatred," Johnson said, noting that Williams stood to profit from the event.
Others at the Buzz on Monday night pointed to local churches that openly embrace gays and that have ministers who are gay. David Loofbourrow, 56, a gay minister, blogger and Oak Park resident, said Monday's discussion brought up an important point about gay issues in Oak Park.
"As great a liberal community as we think we are, there's a lot of work that has to be done in building equality and building cooperation and understanding between factions," Loofbourrow said.
|
Reader Comments
Posted: Saturday, September 19, 2009
Article comment by:
Michael Airhart
Cornelius Williams has already said he opposes the facts and that he favors discrimination and bigotry against gay people. As others have noted, that is a recipe for one-sided hate speech, not civil free speech or discussion.
It's remarkable that his allies seek one-way tolerance and free speech, but do not seek to balance Williams' self-hatred with reputable and well-informed perspectives from the affirming faith and mental health communities.
A token invitation to a political group, Allied for Equality, is hardly a balanced or effective means of balancing a discussion where ex-gay abuse of religion and mental health are concerned.
This is not a situation where two sides deserve 50-50 consideration. The ex-gay pro-bigotry movement has already been discredited by the mental health community, by countless survivors of harmful ex-gay programs, and by several denominations that openly repudiate ex-gay politics and support either affirmation or honest celibacy.
Posted: Thursday, August 20, 2009
Article comment by:
Nicholas Stix
I’d call the gay censors “fascists,” but that would be unfair to fascists. (I'm talking Mussolini here, not Hitler.)
You know something's not quite right, when the only church representative the reporter quotes in a “news” story about homosexuality is an openly homosexual “minister.”
To read the story, you’d never know that homosexuality is a mortal sin in Christianity. (I’m not even a Christian, but I know that! But then, neither is “Minister” David Loofbourrow, and he claims to be a Christian.)
The writer, Marty Stempniak, notes that the APA “took homosexuality off its list of mental disorders” in 1973, and recently condemned “reparative therapy,” but fails to inform readers that such positions are due solely to political pressure by gay activists.
Meanwhile, the reporter quotes six locals supporting the censorship, but only one opposing it. This isn’t a news story at all, but what I call a reportorial, an opinion piece which the writer has sought to disguise as a news report.
Stempniak needs to go straight, and write an opinion column.
Posted: Saturday, August 15, 2009
Article comment by:
Bruce Broerman
If the event had been promoted as supposedly intended, i.e. to debunk Cornelius Williams and his book, then there would have been no protest at all from the LGBTQ community. But that was not the case. Free speech and open debate should assume rational viewpoints based on facts, where there are legitimate grounds for differing views. Religious conviction is inherently irrational and oblivious to scientific facts and inquiry. So why would anyone grant such an indiviudal a forum for promoting a book that espouses irrationality and perpetuates the damage that such views continue to inflict?
Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009
Article comment by:
Jim Bowman
As I say elsewhere -- http://blithespirit.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/oak-park-trustee-backs-denial-of-venue-for-author/ -- The whole business deals a harsh setback to the gay-rights movement in Oak Park, which has hitherto enjoyed wide support.
Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009
Article comment by:
Cornelius Williams
I agree with Larry Judson... Oak Park has not heard the last of this. I will be heard in time!
Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009
Article comment by:
Greg Raub
I applaud Laura for re-thinking this event. When I heard about it, I did e-mail the Buzz in an attempt to understand the purpose of the event and how it was going to be structured.(For the record, I did not threaten any sort of boycott.) The event was promoted as a panel discussion led by Mr. Williams. I never did get an answer to my questions around who else was going to be on the panel and how it would be led. So my concern -- beyond being offended by how Mr. Williams characterizes his life as a homosexual as one filled with "rape, anger, bitternes, mental breakdowns, alchohol, suicidal tendencies and a serious sex addiction" were that this would be a one-sided presentation of inaccurate and hate-filled opinions.
Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009
Article comment by:
Cheryl Haugh
Hold up, everyone! This article, although journalistically thorough, characterized the meeting held Monday night as a protest and attack of The Buzz and Laura Maychuk. That was not the agenda of attendees nor what transpired. Laura told the group that she canceled because the last email she received, accused her of supporting William's reparative ministry. She was distrought that anyone would think that and that's why Williams was cancelled. As to preventing free speech or stamping out the event, this was not the position of either the folks gathered or the subsequent tone of the meeting. In fact, we went there to honor Laura's decision and explain the reaction she experience. I, personally, was surprised (albeit happy) to get Laura's email canceling the program. My personal explanation for feeling impassioned about the invitation extended Williams, was that it was offensive to bring that kind of misinformed, self righteous, book promoting into a community priding itself on exceptance of the GLBT community. It was naive to think this would promote dialog. It would be one side against another. Deadlock. Confrontation. 1st amendment rights are for the people, yes, but in public venues. We don't allow offensive, hateful or objectionable behavior displayed in our homes, small businesses or schools. In each case people have a right to choose. Nor is there a responsibilty to the 1st amendment in those cases. Where the intent of this program was innocent, invisioning a lively debate consistance with The Buzz's commitment to open forum, it was clear the vision did not consider how the GLBT community would feel. When Nazi's wanted to march in Skokie, they were given a permit to do so on the streets. Jewish synagog's were not criticized for nor expected to invite them in for a spirited discussion of their differences. I think the dialog we all had with Laura that night was informative and an opportunity to better know each other. THAT was more constructive and meaningful than a so called panel discussion. By the way, there were as many self identified "straight" supports as gays in attendance. Too bad Mr. Murphy did not bring his passion to The Buzz that night to experience, first hand, what actually took place!
Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009
Article comment by:
Steve Maxey
The quote from Mr. Williams in this article, "I don't buy the facts. What I agree with and relate to is the scripture," makes it clear why this reading should never have been scheduled. Once someone takes the position that the facts don't matter, there is no legitimate discussion or debate to be had.
Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009
Article comment by:
David Steven Rappoport
The Buzz Cafe was profoundly insensitive, and deserves the response they got. No one said Cornelius Williams didn't have a right to free speech, no matter how repugnant his views are. But the community also has a right to be outraged that a local business chose to give this hateful nonsense credibility by sponsoring a public foruum for it. Further, I think a public has every right to draw a line between appropriate public discourse and public discussion which has as its intent the victimization of minority groups. There is no scientific basis for anything Reverend Williams has to say, nor any credible public policy interest inherent in it. The American Psychological Association stated clearly that ex-gay therapy is ineffective this past week after a multi-year study. People like Reverend Williams cite discredited or distorted research to support their contention that gay and lesbian can and should go through therapy to change their sexual orientation. Worse, their underlying assumption, that there is something intrinsically disordered about gays and lesbians, contributes to the continuing oppression of gays and lesbians, such as the murderous attack on gay teenagers in Israel within the last two weeks. The heterosexuals proclaiming free speech rights in their comments here ought to consider how they'd feel if someone held public forums questioning their right to be who they are. I am quite sure they wouldn't be quite so sanguine about it.
Posted: Friday, August 14, 2009
Article comment by:
donna
I think this is wrong how the owners of Buzz Cafe are being treated. It was just a discussion and debate. I thought Oak Park was all about open-minded tolerance.
Posted: Thursday, August 13, 2009
Article comment by:
howard cook
We should become increasingly concerned about a group that protests someone's right to free speech or an opinion while demanding open-mindedness and tolerance, whether it be something they agree with or not. What happened to this community? I couldn't think of a better example of something more unamerican and hypocritical. And to take it to the level of threatening a local business with protest - a place that has brought more than food and chairs but a place to share and be neighbors. It's a detriment to Oak Park's meaning of community for being so close minded and unaccepting. I think Laura is owed an apology and a cup of coffee.
Posted: Thursday, August 13, 2009
Article comment by:
Alan Amato
Healthy debate is the hallmark of our democracy. Yelling "fire" in a crowded theater is not. It is meant to cause harm. Mr. Williams with his hateful and harmful views (which have been widely condemned by professionals) does not offer a discussion but a condemnation of a segment of America. That is not a "conversation"...that is an attack. That is not democracy.
Posted: Thursday, August 13, 2009
Article comment by:
Freespirit
Mention to any gay person that their "choice" to be that way can be challenged, and they RUN! They don't welcome change, unless it's joining their "cause" and helping to change laws that DON'T benefit their lifestyle choices. Afraid they are!! There was no real need to cancel Mr. Williams appearance at the Buzz, except for maybe Laura Maychruk was afraid that business would go down if she didn't?? Who cares Laura if ppl think the Buzz shares the authors views?? What are ALL your customers gay? Might they picket your store if you didn't share their views? Possibly sue you for something? Oh maybe they would talk about you in the Wednesday Journal saying how you're "espousing bigotry & hate" simply because of your opinion! Sad, Sad indeed Laura that in this situation you had no backbone.
Posted: Thursday, August 13, 2009
Article comment by:
Larry Judson
Wow! Free speech only for those that have the same opinions and values as yourselves? What a joke. For a group that demands open mindedness from others, you sure are closing your minds off in this situation. And attacking a coffee shop owner for hosting an author? What are you afraid of?
Posted: Thursday, August 13, 2009
Article comment by:
Jim Coughlin
The "american" thing for Dennis Murphy to do is to offer an invitation to Mr. Williams to speak at Poor Phil's.
|
|
Article Comment Submission Form
|